Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) argued that government intervention drives up costs for Americans, calling for fewer regulations, lower taxes and a greater reliance on free-market solutions to make everyday expenses more affordable.
Scott Pushes For Less Government
On Tuesday, in a post on X, Scott criticized government involvement in the economy, sharing a video clip of himself arguing that government policies often increase prices instead of solving affordability challenges.
“Everything the government touches becomes unaffordable,” Scott wrote.
He added, “Government needs to get out of the way so hardworking Americans can keep more of their hard-earned money & prices can come down.”
In the video, Scott pointed to housing, college tuition, and health care as examples in which he believes government involvement has contributed to rising costs.
“Have you ever noticed when government gets involved in things, they say, oh, we’re going to fix that,” he said.
He added, “You know, start to mess around with it. What happens? It goes up in price.”
Scott argued that reducing regulations, taxes, fees and permitting requirements would give businesses and consumers more flexibility.
“Maybe we ought to have less government, more freedom,” he said.
He continued, “Less red tape, less taxes, less fees, less permits … and you will get lower prices and have a chance to live your American dream.”
Democrats Slam Trump Spending Priorities
Earlier, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi accused Republicans of prioritizing “endless wars” over domestic needs, citing a reported $73 billion increase in defense-related spending while families faced higher costs.
She argued the GOP budget reflected “America Last” priorities.
Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) criticized proposed funding for a White House East Wing ballroom and a $1.8 billion “weaponization fund,” saying the money could instead support infrastructure, public health, education and school meal programs.
She argued that government budgets show leaders’ priorities.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) also attacked Trump’s spending plans, alleging that billions were being directed toward a “MAGA slush fund” and the White House ballroom project while Americans struggled with affordability concerns.
He said Democrats were focused on reducing costs for families.
Disclaimer: This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.
Photo courtesy: lev radin / Shutterstock.com
